 |
|
|
 |
In spite of these doubts, in the
next sections, I will try to find a solution for defining an absolute
cosmic
time.
Next, however, the begun „formal“
procedure shall be brought to an end, by further using the Newton time
t as time parameter.
Matter and „gravitation constant“
From
(2),
(4) and (7) follows:
GM =
const.
(8)
As, so far, there is no
process
known that might sensibly question the law of conservation of energy,
let
us postulate
E = Mc2 =
const.
With c ~ t -1/3 , there results, for
the
total mass of the universe:
M ~ t 2/3 ~
R
(9)
and for the gravitation constant:
G ~ M -1
~ R-1 ~ c2
~ t - 2/ 3
(10)
It is interesting that H. J. Fahr,
by considerations based on an experiment of thoughts that had already
been
published by Thirring in 1921 , also requires the proportionality
expressed
in (9), by writing [5], p. 206:
”that with a doubling of all
metric
distances in the universe, a doubling of the effective world mass
should
come along!”
However, it is not fully known until
now, on which mechanism the continuous creation of matter is based.
Paul
Davies writes in this respect [18], p. 53/54: “ In the laboratory,
particles
can collide at high speed, and there appear four where before there had
only been two. The “price” for the creation of the new particles is the
decrease of speed of the original ones. The transformation of
untouchable
motion into something one can touch comes very close to the image of
the
creation from the nothing".. Why should something certified
unambiguously
in the laboratory not also happen elsewhere in the universe? Thus,
there
is no trustworthy argument which could forbid the hypothesis c ~ t-1/3®
M ~ t 2/3
(E = Mc2
= constant)! The idea of a “gravitation constant” G, decreasing with
time
is not new, as well.
|
|
|
|