 |
|
|
 |
According to measurements
performed
by the Hubble space telescope, there are, at the borders of the
observable
universe, at least ten times as many low- luminous galaxies than in our
cosmic vicinity [37]: “The early universe was crowded by more- than-
average blue galaxies having apparent, strong emission lines. From this
can be concluded that they built up stars much faster than today’s
galaxies,
as only an extensive population of very hot suns is able to excite the
gas within the system to such a strong luminosity. Such hot suns only
exist
for a relatively short period of some million years and therefore must
have built up incessantly, at that time.”
This high star buildup rate in the
early universe resulting from observation coincides with the CTH, which
also demands a higher star buildup rate for the past than for today:
(M ~ t 2/3, 
).
The short duration of stars’ life in the early universe from today’s view also comes the way of the CTH, as the typical time t (cosmic time) was extended in relation to the now time: Dt /Dt ~ t -1/3
Discrepancy between distance and red shift of supernovae in far galaxies
Under the title: “Revolution
in
the cosmology ”, a rather strange picture of the universe’s development
was presented, based on the measurement of the space- time by means
of
so- called 1a- supernovae [27], p. 38 ff:
“The finding:
Some billion years ago, the
universe
expanded slower than today. Therefore, contrary to present assumption,
the expansion rate increases.
The observation:
The decisive indication to the
increased expansion rate of the cosmos was given by supernovae in far
galaxies,
the observed maximum luminosity of which is a measure for their
distance
.”
According to this, the observed
supernovae would be more distant than their red shifts indicate, or,
resp.
, their red shifts would be lower than their distance indicates.
From this, the cosmologists deduced
an accelerated expansion of the universe, the cause of which they
believe
to be a cosmological constant L
> 0 .
For this phenomenon as well,
the CTH supplies a much simpler, more coercive explanation:
In first approximation, between
red shift z and velocity c of signals, there is the relation [10]:
(24)
The higher the velocity of signals,
the lower will the red shift be. In the CTH, c ~ t
- 1/3 .
|
|
|
|