 |
|
|
 |
G ~ t – 2/3
®
GM = const. (8)
The idea of a “gravitation constant”
that decreases with time is not new, as well.
It had been postulated by Paul Dirac
in 1937 already [21].
Dirac wondered, the relation between
the attraction force of an electron and a proton, based on their electric
charge ± e and that based on their masses me and
mp (Fe/FG = m2/memp
G = N1 »
10 39 ) is in the same range of magnitude as t1/te
= N2
» 10
41
(t1»
R1/c = today’s world age, te = re/c =
time the light needs to travel the elementary length re
[22], p. 306.
While N1 , according
to conventional physics, is constant, N2 measures the
scale of the universe, and since the universe expands, N2
increases with the time. Dirac did not believe, the equality of N1»
N2 is only accidental, but assumed a fundamental physical relation
to hide behind this.
In order to make N1 always
to equal N2 , he developed the „Large Numbers Hypothesis“, which
demanded a „gravitation constant” decreasing with time (G ~ t -1)
.
When regarded closely, the „fitting
accuracy“ of the Dirac hypothesis appears to be quite coarse (N1»
10 39, N2 »
10 41.
If we link, however, contrary to
Dirac, instead of the electric force Fe , the strong nuclear
force Fs to the gravitation force FG , then
we receive a surprising, absolutely exact equality (N1= Fs/FG
= 10 41, N2 = 10 41).
By the CTH, the probability, a fundamental
principle of nature hides behind the equality of N1
= N2 , thus grows considerably when compared to the Dirac hypothesis,
and an accidence can therefore well be excluded. (see following table).
Table 1: Large Numbers Hypothesis acc. to Dirac and CTH
( t PL= Planck time,
RPL= world radius at Planck time = re
1) For details,
see Fig. 8
|
|
|
|
|
|