|
|
14
|
|
Meanwhile, the Dirac hypothesis has
been disproved by measurements [16], p. 539/540:
“Until today, we have no
indications
that the gravitation force weakens with time.
The Viking missions to Mars have
shown that the gravitation force, if it varies in the course of
time,
in the 15 billions of years old history of the universe can have
changed
by 1% at the most.
That is one hundredth of
the value predicted by Dirac.”
If, therefore, the „gravitation
constant“ was the only value changing with time, the universe could by
no means have developed the way we observe it today. It is as it is,
since
all other basic values of nature are dependent on time (t) as well.
We should mind especially, the
weakening
of the gravitation field due to a gravitation constant decreasing with
time
(G ~ t - 2/3),
to be expected according to the CTH, is compensated by the continuous
creation
of new matter.
This should be considered when the
data transmitted by the Viking missile are evaluated.
Possibly, there also could be
established
an interesting connection to the Mach principle, which states
[23], p. 281:
„.... all gravity forces are
defined by the total quantity of matter in the universe and are
proportional
to it.”
This statement is in accordance
with the CTH ( M ~ t 2/3, G ~ t - 2/3, G
M
= const.), provided we cling to the identity of inertial and
ponderable
mass.
Remark:
One could argue against the
relations
G ~ t - 2/3 and c ~ t - 1/3 that they have been
deduced
from a theory (GTR), in which c and G are constant, i. e. independent
on
time. This objection can easily be cleared, as c and G do not
appear
as isolated values in the field equations of the GTR, but are linked to
each other by the coupling constant k
= 8p
G/c2 = const. As, from Fig. 3, also follows G/c2 =
const., there is no contradiction to the GTR.
4.5 Solution
of the problems of the big bang theory
The big bang theory has some
weaknesses
which partly are tried to be solved by the „inflationary model”
[24], [9], p. 8 - 11.
|
|
|
14
|
|
|