 |
|
|
 |
4.8 The
hypothesis
of the Earth expansion
According to the CTH (G ~ t -2/3),
the gravitation pressure in the Earth globe must constantly
decrease.
The consequence from this would be, the Earth slowly grows in the
course
of time.
By this, however, the high expansion
rate, demanded by the globe models, cannot be explained. The most
plausible
explanation for the EE supplies the hypothesis of Gottfried [7],
especially
if one takes into consideration, the pressure in the Earth material
declines
exponentially ( p ~ r -4 ), with growing earth
radius.
The gravitation constant decreasing with time only is the trigger for
the
EE.
5. Support of the EE hypothesis and the CTH by the observation data
Let me refrain from listing facts here that have already been deliberated and documented seriously in the relevant literature before. Let me deliberate only such observations which have not been verified by means of the presented hypotheses ( EE and CTH).
5.1 Increase
of the day length
According to the torque impulse
law w q
= const. (w
= angular velocity, q
= mass inertia), there is, for a constant Earth mass
q ~ r
2
, i. e.
(10)
( t = day length)
If we start from a “shelf
globe”
having a radius (r 2 ) of approx. 58 % of today’s Earth
radius
(r 1 ) [1], [35] and if we assume, a solid Earth crust has
shaped
about 4 billions of years ago, then we receive
= 3.0 ®
t 2 = 
= 8 h, i. e.
D t =
t 1 – t 2 = 24 – 8 = 16 h in 4 billion years.
This means a rotation delay of 1.44
.
10
–5
s/a, as an average value between Earth crust shaping and today or,
resp.,
a present value of 1.8
. 10 –5
s/a 1)
1) The
difference
between these two values result from the square relation between earth
radius and day length ( t ~ r 2 )
|
|
|
|
|
|