|
|
23
|
|
By means of historical
documentations
of sun eclipses we can prove, the day length has increased by 1.7 .
10 –5 s/a, in the average over the past 2500 years [36].
Therefore,
that value for the Earth rotation delay demanded by the EE hypothesis
and
that one gained by observations coincide surprisingly well.
Presumptions
for this are, the tide effects of the moon are negligible and the Earth
mass remains approximately constant.
5.2 Continuous
formation of matter in the universe
As mentioned before, Halton Arp,
by means of astronomical observations, achieves the result, matter must
develop continuously in the universe.
Newer research results also confirm
this statement:
B.P. Wakker and his team from the
Wisconsin- Madison university (USA) has investigated a gas cloud
[37], p. 6:
“…. which lays up to 40000 light
years above our Milky Way. If only gas clouds from the “galactic
fountain”
would be in the halo, then the part of heavy elements should be larger
in younger stars than in older ones. But this is not so. Instead, a gas
rain replenishes the hydrogen stock of our Milky Way which, according
to
the results of Wakker never has been in the Milky Way before. Moreover,
the matter seems to come from outside. The question of its origin,
however,
remains unanswered.”
The formation of new matter,
stabilizing
the plane universe, must be preferred to the spontaneous formation of
matter
shortly after the big bang, for mere theoretical reasons as well.
Following
back in time, the big bang universe would at some time have been caught
in its own Schwarzschild radius, from which no escape would nave been
possible
[32]. Therefore, the universe we observe should not exist at all, if
the
big bang theory in its present form was correct!
The thesis of the continuous
creation
of matter is also confirmed by the numerous, extraordinarily dim
galaxies
with partly giant dimensions observed in the past years [38], p. 62:
“During the past years,
astronomers
have discovered more than thousand diffuse star systems which barely
shine
brighter than the background of the night sky. These dim objects,
belonging
to a galaxy type unknown before supply new discoveries on how
mass
is distributed in the universe and how galaxies develop.”
These so- called LSB galaxies
attract
attention because they contain mostly gas and very little heavy
elements,
and were considered to be the least developed objects in the universe,
which, in the course of billions of years after big bang, have barely
changed
[39], p. 67. This interpretation is extremely unsatisfying for the very
reason alone that it presumes star birth and matter densifying
processes
totally different from those observed in the universe elsewhere.
It would be much more plausible
to explain these gloomy objects by means of the CTH, as just being in
the
process of new creation, building up matter according to the relation M
~ t 2/3 and only reaching the luminosity of normal galaxies
after billions of years.
|
|
|
23
|
|
|