30

The CTH clearly shows, physics and cosmology are no „objective“ sciences, but are based upon an axiomatic system of values. The same cannot be avoided for any philosophical or theological stucture.
But the sciences of nature have a decisive advantage: Their statements are verifiable, i. e. they can be confirmed by sensual perception. Now, Immanuel Kant  had already expressed clearly, neither the sensual perception nor the notion  we attribute to things are identical with the reality. In order to be able to formulate “natural laws” at all, we first must decide which subjective standpoint we choose as a starting base. That means: We only can develop models of the reality, but never can describe the reality itself. Newton, e. g., defined an absolute (abstract) time and the absolute (abstract) space as axiomatic premises for his theories and was very successful with this. Only 200 years later, Einstein could prove, some more subtle areas of physics could not be described or, resp., explained by means of the Newton mechanics and, starting from the axiom of the universal constancy of the  light speed, he developed the Theory of Relativity. In this, he linked the terms space, time and matter, formerly independent terms, to each other and thus revolutionized our notion of the natural phenomena.
The CTH even moves one step further by eliminating some weaknesses which the Theory of Relativity obviously contains when processes in cosmic dimensions  or even processes close to the big bang are concerned.
According to the CTH, the universe presents a linked, self-regulating  system that is in the state of dynamic equilibrium.
Time, space, matter and the natural laws linking them to each other are tightly connected in a way that causes the cosmic evlution to remain surprisingly stable. The CTH also confirms the vision obtained in many other areas of sciences, holistic systems present a completely different quality than that to be expected from the sum of the qualities of the parts they are consisting of.
Behind this "holistic" quality hides that part of our reality which, in a mysterious way, is creative in the cosmos and cannot completely be comprehended rationally. It is a typical feature of the CTH, it is only built on premises which are ascertained so well in science that they are not doubted by the majority of conservative phsicists. In spite of its conservative foundation, based on natural science, one cannot deny, a component of the CTH is not accessible to ratio, if one tries to comprehend its substantial statements ¹⁾. It is new that (among others), the CTH links the various basic values of physics in such a way that we can no longer speak of “natural constants” in the conventional (abstract) sense. All values are symbiotically linked to each other via the parameter time. Even the beat of time itself varies with time, if we measure it with the time scale of the Newton time we are used to.
Certainly, it will be difficult to prove the CTH experimentally, absolutely free from doubts, as this demands extreme and long term stable measurement accuracies which hardly can be achieved at the present time. For the time being,  it draws its legitimation from its ability to solve some fundamental problems of physics and cosmology, which the established theories are not able to solve, and that it imparts to us an imagination of the evolution of the universe which is impressively supported by the latest observation data from the astrophysicists. The CTH is not more, but also not less, than a theoretical model  which is able to describe at least a part of the reality more conclusively than possible so far.
¹⁾ This, by the way, also applies to the Newton gravitation laws.
Until now, nobody can explain the gravitation, i. e. give a reason for the fact 2 masses attract each other.

30