Logically, it is impossible to understand
all phenomena od nature we observe – especially the „long term processes“
in the universe, correctly. One could also argue differently: The path
to a better understanding of the time term must necessarily lead via the
cosmology, as only this opens sufficiently large space-time dimensions
to us to perform, at all, those measurements necessary for the definition
of a „cosmic time term“. On one hand, the modern measuring devices offered
by the satellite-supported sensor technology should be sufficient for this
task, but on the other hand, we need a theoretical model giving us the
information pertaining on what we should observe.
Or, as Einstein formulated drastically
[3], p. 96/97: "Only the theory decides on what one can observe".
In [4], a suitable theoretical model
for this is presented and confronted to the latest cognitions of cosmology
and elementary particles physics. In this, it shows, the path leading us
to a more comprehensive understanding of the time can only be found via
the General Theory of Relativity (GTR).
2. An alternative
world model- presentation of the results
The following deliberations are based
upon axioms which today are accepted by the majority in science:
- Axiom 1: The speed of light is
a universal natural constant
- Axiom 2: The laws of the GTR apply
to the total universe
- Axiom 3: The universe spans out
a plane (Euclidean) space, in the average over large distances
- Axiom 4: The universe expands
at the speed of light
Let me presume here, the „cosmic
time“ is the result of solving the paradoxon arising from axioms 1 and
4, in context with the GTR. [4].
From the field equations of the
GTR, Einstein had, for a plane expanding universe,( Einstein- de Sitter-
universe) ( Fig. 1), deduced the relation [5]. p. 107 ff
(1)
(
= coupling constant in the field equations of the GTR, r
= average mass density of the universe,
h = H/c = 1/t H c = 1/R
= Hubble expansion )
 |
|
4
|
|
|
