3.2 The cosmic
(absolute?) time
(5)
As the following quotations show,
Ernst Mach was the first and later other scientists, as well, to take an
“absolute” time into consideration whose existence is defined by cosmic
processes [1], p. 21 ff:
“If, by natural laws, one process
would be especially distinguished, then one could use this for the definition
of an “absolute” time measure….. Mach had assumed that the “entropy of
the universe” could be used as a value for the absolute time.”
J. Barrow also expresses doubts
towards the conventional time term [9], p. 481:
"How can we know that there is
not a basic time measure which is linked to the total universe?”
Paul Davies is even more explicit
[2], p. 212:
"Cannot one use the expansion
of the universe itself as a clock?”
It is interesting, Henning Genz
even takes the same solution as (1) into consideration, by questioning
but, however, not giving a founded reason for this [6], p. 229:
“Why then not go all the way
and use the radius of the universe as time parameter?”
According to (5), those basic values
representing our physical reality, time (t),
space (R), and matter(M) are linked to the cosmic evolution in a surprising
way.
The discomfort towards the abstract
Newton time expressed in the above quotations obviously rests on the fact,
it escapes any attempt to interpret it as an empirically verifyable term.
An impressive feature of the CTH
is, it demands a time metric which is linked to cosmic processes we can
observe, and it can, strictly logically, be deduced from the GTR
[4].
|
|