The big bang, when projeced to the
cosmic
time scale, dissolves into a process that is not focussed to time, i.
e.,
it recedes into an infinitely far
past. This is a result which also supports the request to modify
the big bang theory, which has been stated time and again during the
past
years . [24], p. 25:
“The Einstein Theory of
Relativity,
formulated in 1915, supplied, in theTwenties, the most evident
explanation
for the beginning of our universe so far. According to Einstein, the
universe
was born about 10 to 15 billions of years ago in a giant explosion, the
big bang. But the Einstein theory has many gaps.
Why did the universe explode?
What happened before the big bang?
Theologians as well as other
scientists meanwhile are convinced of the incompleteness of the big
bang
theory, as it can neither explain the coming into existence of the big
bang, nor the big bang itself.”
Supposedly, the reason was, nobody
could know at that time about the property of the space – time
continuum.
Is it positively or negatively curved or plane?
Now, the time metric depends
decisively
on the curvature of the space- time or, respectively, on the delay
parameter
q of the cosmic expansion.
For a (hypothetical) universe
expanding
at constant speed ( Fig. 1, limit case I, q = 0, the Newton time would
be identical with the cosmic time [4].
At an increasing delay parameter
q, the difference between the cosmic and the Newton time also increases
all the more.
For a plane universe (Fig. I, limit
case III, q = ½), the cosmic time limps behind the Newton time
by
about 1 millisecond per year.
Therefore, the „normal physics"
will not change if we replace the Newton time by the cosmic time.
The difference between both
these
time scales, however, gains decisive importance if we try to comprehend
the processes in the early universe.
While the STR relates the time to
the relative speed v at which 2 systems of reference move to each other
( Fig. 3),
the CTH relates the time scale in
dependency on the world age (Fig. 4), both figures on p. 10.
Both time scales are founded on
the constancy of the speed of light in vacuum.
The idea that there could be a time
beat that is variable versus time is also not new [2], p. 168:
„Einstein freed the time from
the chains of the Newton invariability: We know that the time can vary
from place to place. Why not from time to time, too? Could this be an
imaginable
solution for the problem of the time scale?”
Meanwhile, the Einstein time
dilatation
according to Fig. 3 has excellently been confirmed by experiments.
Naturally, there cannot be an
experimental
confirmation for a time dilatation depending on the world age as, so
far,
a theory demanding such measurements has not existed as yet.
Besides, it is questionable whether
a direct experimental confirmation of the CTH would be possible at
all,as
we must start from the assumption that all clocks do not measure the
Newton,
but the cosmic time instead [4].
If at all, then probably only an
indirect confirmation for the correctness of the CTH will have a chance.
 |
|
9
|
|
|
